| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181119162640.232171384@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:27:55 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 168/205] hugetlbfs: fix kernel BUG at fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:444!
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
commit 5e41540c8a0f0e98c337dda8b391e5dda0cde7cf upstream.
This bug has been experienced several times by the Oracle DB team. The
BUG is in remove_inode_hugepages() as follows:
/*
* If page is mapped, it was faulted in after being
* unmapped in caller. Unmap (again) now after taking
* the fault mutex. The mutex will prevent faults
* until we finish removing the page.
*
* This race can only happen in the hole punch case.
* Getting here in a truncate operation is a bug.
*/
if (unlikely(page_mapped(page))) {
BUG_ON(truncate_op);
In this case, the elevated map count is not the result of a race.
Rather it was incorrectly incremented as the result of a bug in the huge
pmd sharing code. Consider the following:
- Process A maps a hugetlbfs file of sufficient size and alignment
(PUD_SIZE) that a pmd page could be shared.
- Process B maps the same hugetlbfs file with the same size and
alignment such that a pmd page is shared.
- Process B then calls mprotect() to change protections for the mapping
with the shared pmd. As a result, the pmd is 'unshared'.
- Process B then calls mprotect() again to chage protections for the
mapping back to their original value. pmd remains unshared.
- Process B then forks and process C is created. During the fork
process, we do dup_mm -> dup_mmap -> copy_page_range to copy page
tables. Copying page tables for hugetlb mappings is done in the
routine copy_hugetlb_page_range.
In copy_hugetlb_page_range(), the destination pte is obtained by:
dst_pte = huge_pte_alloc(dst, addr, sz);
If pmd sharing is possible, the returned pointer will be to a pte in an
existing page table. In the situation above, process C could share with
either process A or process B. Since process A is first in the list,
the returned pte is a pointer to a pte in process A's page table.
However, the check for pmd sharing in copy_hugetlb_page_range is:
/* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references */
if (dst_pte == src_pte)
continue;
Since process C is sharing with process A instead of process B, the
above test fails. The code in copy_hugetlb_page_range which follows
assumes dst_pte points to a huge_pte_none pte. It copies the pte entry
from src_pte to dst_pte and increments this map count of the associated
page. This is how we end up with an elevated map count.
To solve, check the dst_pte entry for huge_pte_none. If !none, this
implies PMD sharing so do not copy.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105212315.14125-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: c5c99429fa57 ("fix hugepages leak due to pagetable page sharing")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3233,7 +3233,7 @@ static int is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(p
int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
- pte_t *src_pte, *dst_pte, entry;
+ pte_t *src_pte, *dst_pte, entry, dst_entry;
struct page *ptepage;
unsigned long addr;
int cow;
@@ -3261,15 +3261,30 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_st
break;
}
- /* If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references */
- if (dst_pte == src_pte)
+ /*
+ * If the pagetables are shared don't copy or take references.
+ * dst_pte == src_pte is the common case of src/dest sharing.
+ *
+ * However, src could have 'unshared' and dst shares with
+ * another vma. If dst_pte !none, this implies sharing.
+ * Check here before taking page table lock, and once again
+ * after taking the lock below.
+ */
+ dst_entry = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
+ if ((dst_pte == src_pte) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry))
continue;
dst_ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, dst, dst_pte);
src_ptl = huge_pte_lockptr(h, src, src_pte);
spin_lock_nested(src_ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
entry = huge_ptep_get(src_pte);
- if (huge_pte_none(entry)) { /* skip none entry */
+ dst_entry = huge_ptep_get(dst_pte);
+ if (huge_pte_none(entry) || !huge_pte_none(dst_entry)) {
+ /*
+ * Skip if src entry none. Also, skip in the
+ * unlikely case dst entry !none as this implies
+ * sharing with another vma.
+ */
;
} else if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_migration(entry) ||
is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(entry))) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists