[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181119162619.331598196@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:26:38 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 002/171] powerpc/64/module: REL32 relocation range check
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit b851ba02a6f3075f0f99c60c4bc30a4af80cf428 ]
The recent module relocation overflow crash demonstrated that we
have no range checking on REL32 relative relocations. This patch
implements a basic check, the same kernel that previously oopsed
and rebooted now continues with some of these errors when loading
the module:
module_64: x_tables: REL32 527703503449812 out of range!
Possibly other relocations (ADDR32, REL16, TOC16, etc.) should also have
overflow checks.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
@@ -685,7 +685,14 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf64_Shdr *sechd
case R_PPC64_REL32:
/* 32 bits relative (used by relative exception tables) */
- *(u32 *)location = value - (unsigned long)location;
+ /* Convert value to relative */
+ value -= (unsigned long)location;
+ if (value + 0x80000000 > 0xffffffff) {
+ pr_err("%s: REL32 %li out of range!\n",
+ me->name, (long int)value);
+ return -ENOEXEC;
+ }
+ *(u32 *)location = value;
break;
case R_PPC64_TOCSAVE:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists