[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181119162636.098020352@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:28:25 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 109/171] ext4: missing !bh check in ext4_xattr_inode_write()
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
commit eb6984fa4ce2837dcb1f66720a600f31b0bb3739 upstream.
According to Ted Ts'o ext4_getblk() called in ext4_xattr_inode_write()
should not return bh = NULL
The only time that bh could be NULL, then, would be in the case of
something really going wrong; a programming error elsewhere (perhaps a
wild pointer dereference) or I/O error causing on-disk file system
corruption (although that would be highly unlikely given that we had
*just* allocated the blocks and so the metadata blocks in question
probably would still be in the cache).
Fixes: e50e5129f384 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org # 4.13
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -1388,6 +1388,12 @@ retry:
bh = ext4_getblk(handle, ea_inode, block, 0);
if (IS_ERR(bh))
return PTR_ERR(bh);
+ if (!bh) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ EXT4_ERROR_INODE(ea_inode,
+ "ext4_getblk() return bh = NULL");
+ return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ }
ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh);
if (ret)
goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists