lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <524e54fa-c7b2-7cf5-7bd1-7b9ad7a64a46@molgen.mpg.de>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 21:31:31 +0100
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Realtek NIC uses over 1 Watt with no traffic

Dear Heiner,


Thank you for your reply.

Am 20.11.18 um 21:14 schrieb Heiner Kallweit:
> On 20.11.2018 15:45, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:40:25AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:

>>> Using Ubuntu 18.10, Linux 4.18.0-11-generic, PowerTOP 2.9 shows, the NIC
>>> uses 1.77 Watts. A network cable is plugged in, but there is no real traffic
>>> according to `iftop`. Only an email program is running.
>>>
>>>      $ lspci -nn -s 3:00.1
>>>      03:00.1 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
>>> RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller [10ec:8168] (rev
>>> 12)
>>>
>>> Is that a measurement error, or does the NIC really need that much power?

>> This sounds like Energy Efficient Ethernet, EEE, is not enabled.
>>
>> What does ethtool --show-eee ethX say?

     $ sudo ethtool --show-eee enp3s0f1
     Cannot get EEE settings: Operation not supported

> The r8169 driver doesn't support the get_eee ethtool_ops callback.
> For certain chip versions EEE gets enabled in the PHY init, for others
> not and some don't seem to support EEE at all.
> 
> Apart from EEE one important factor affecting power consumption is ASPM.
> This was recently enabled for certain chip versions.
> 
> Information that would help:
> 
> whether Wake-on-LAN is enabled ("Wake-on:" line from ethtool output)

```
$ sudo ethtool enp3s0f1
Settings for enp3s0f1:
	Supported ports: [ TP AUI BNC MII FIBRE ]
	Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
	                        100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
	                        1000baseT/Full
	Supported pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
	Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
	Supported FEC modes: Not reported
	Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
	                        100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
	                        1000baseT/Full
	Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
	Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
	Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
	Link partner advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
	                                     100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
	                                     1000baseT/Full
	Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
	Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
	Link partner advertised FEC modes: Not reported
	Speed: 1000Mb/s
	Duplex: Full
	Port: MII
	PHYAD: 0
	Transceiver: internal
	Auto-negotiation: on
	Supports Wake-on: pumbg
	Wake-on: g
	Current message level: 0x00000033 (51)
			       drv probe ifdown ifup
	Link detected: yes
```

So, it’s enabled (g  Wake on MagicPacket(tm)).

Running `sudo ethtool -s enp3s0f1 wol d;` doesn’t change anything though.

> lspci -vv output for the Realtek NIC

Here is the output (quoted, so that Thunderbird does not wrap the line).

> $ sudo lspci -vv -s 3:00.1
> 03:00.1 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
> 	Subsystem: CLEVO/KAPOK Computer RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
> 	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
> 	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> 	Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> 	Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
> 	Region 0: I/O ports at e000 [size=256]
> 	Region 2: Memory at df114000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
> 	Region 4: Memory at df110000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> 	Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> 		Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+)
> 		Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> 	Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
> 		Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
> 	Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 01
> 		DevCap:	MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <64us
> 			ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- SlotPowerLimit 10.000W
> 		DevCtl:	Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
> 			RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
> 			MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 4096 bytes
> 		DevSta:	CorrErr+ UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr+ TransPend-
> 		LnkCap:	Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s unlimited, L1 <64us
> 			ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
> 		LnkCtl:	ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+
> 			ExtSynch- ClockPM+ AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
> 		LnkSta:	Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
> 		DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR+, OBFF Via message/WAKE#
> 		DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR-, OBFF Disabled
> 		LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
> 			 EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
> 	Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=4 Masked-
> 		Vector table: BAR=4 offset=00000000
> 		PBA: BAR=4 offset=00000800
> 	Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data
> pcilib: sysfs_read_vpd: read failed: Input/output error
> 		Not readable
> 	Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
> 		UESta:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> 		UEMsk:	DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> 		UESvrt:	DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt- UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
> 		CESta:	RxErr+ BadTLP+ BadDLLP+ Rollover- Timeout+ NonFatalErr+
> 		CEMsk:	RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout- NonFatalErr+
> 		AERCap:	First Error Pointer: 00, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+ ChkEn-
> 	Capabilities: [160 v1] Device Serial Number 01-00-00-00-68-4c-e0-00
> 	Capabilities: [170 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
> 		Max snoop latency: 3145728ns
> 		Max no snoop latency: 3145728ns
> 	Capabilities: [178 v1] L1 PM Substates
> 		L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
> 			  PortCommonModeRestoreTime=150us PortTPowerOnTime=150us
> 		L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
> 			   T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
> 		L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
> 	Kernel driver in use: r8169
> 	Kernel modules: r8169

Some Active State Power Management levels seem to be enabled.

> Info from powertop about package C states. With ASPM my system reaches
> 50% PC7 + 50% PC10.

That seems to be the case on my TUXEDO Book BU1406 too.

>           Paket     |             Kern    |            CPU 0       CPU 2
>                     |                     | C0 aktiv    1,7%        1,1%
>                     |                     | POLL        0,0%    0,0 ms  0,0%    0,0 ms
>                     |                     | C1E         0,2%    0,8 ms  0,1%    0,2 ms
> C2 (pc2)    5,2%    |                     |
> C3 (pc3)   82,1%    | C3 (cc3)    0,0%    | C3          0,0%    0,2 ms  0,1%    0,2 ms
> C6 (pc6)    0,0%    | C6 (cc6)    1,3%    | C6          0,8%    0,5 ms  1,4%    0,6 ms
> C7 (pc7)    0,0%    | C7 (cc7)   90,8%    | C7s         0,0%    1,6 ms  0,0%    0,0 ms
> C8 (pc8)    0,0%    |                     | C8          6,0%    1,8 ms 10,1%    2,0 ms
> C9 (pc9)    0,0%    |                     | C9          0,2%    2,8 ms  0,2%    2,9 ms
> C10 (pc10)  0,0%    |                     | C10        88,7%   12,7 ms 84,4%   14,9 ms
> 
>                     |             Kern    |            CPU 1       CPU 3
>                     |                     | C0 aktiv    1,0%        0,8%
>                     |                     | POLL        0,0%    0,0 ms  0,0%    0,0 ms
>                     |                     | C1E         0,1%    0,3 ms  0,1%    0,3 ms
>                     |                     |
>                     | C3 (cc3)    0,0%    | C3          0,0%    0,2 ms  0,0%    0,2 ms
>                     | C6 (cc6)    1,1%    | C6          0,9%    0,6 ms  0,8%    0,5 ms
>                     | C7 (cc7)   92,2%    | C7s         0,0%    1,7 ms  0,0%    0,0 ms
>                     |                     | C8          6,2%    1,7 ms  5,4%    1,7 ms
>                     |                     | C9          0,3%    1,7 ms  0,1%    1,9 ms
>                     |                     | C10        88,8%   12,1 ms 90,7%   14,8 ms
> 
>                     |             GPU     |
>                     |                     |
>                     | Powered On  2,2%    |
>                     | RC6        97,8%    |
>                     | RC6p        0,0%    |
>                     | RC6pp       0,0%    |

> dmesg output filtered for "r8169". Primarily relevant is the line with
> the chip name and XID.

Please find them below.

> $ sudo dmesg | grep r8169
> [    5.318442] calling  rtl8169_pci_driver_init+0x0/0x1000 [r8169] @ 418
> [    5.318470] r8169 0000:03:00.1: enabling device (0000 -> 0003)
> [    5.340324] libphy: r8169: probed
> [    5.340630] r8169 0000:03:00.1 eth0: RTL8411, 80:fa:5b:3b:dd:f0, XID 5c800800, IRQ 136
> [    5.340632] r8169 0000:03:00.1 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9200 bytes, tx checksumming: ko]
> [    5.340673] initcall rtl8169_pci_driver_init+0x0/0x1000 [r8169] returned 0 after 9217 usecs
> [    5.799967] r8169 0000:03:00.1 enp3s0f1: renamed from eth0
> [   10.036968] Generic PHY r8169-301:00: attached PHY driver [Generic PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=r8169-301:00, irq=IGNORE)
> [  676.940934] calling  rtl8169_pci_driver_init+0x0/0x1000 [r8169] @ 22235
> [  676.952411] libphy: r8169: probed
> [  676.952701] r8169 0000:03:00.1 eth0: RTL8411, 80:fa:5b:3b:dd:f0, XID 5c800800, IRQ 139
> [  676.952702] r8169 0000:03:00.1 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9200 bytes, tx checksumming: ko]
> [  676.952736] initcall rtl8169_pci_driver_init+0x0/0x1000 [r8169] returned 0 after 11518 usecs
> [  676.954420] r8169 0000:03:00.1 enp3s0f1: renamed from eth0
> [  676.975161] Generic PHY r8169-301:00: attached PHY driver [Generic PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=r8169-301:00, irq=IGNORE)
> [  680.518923] r8169 0000:03:00.1 enp3s0f1: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
> [ 1751.285899] r8169 0000:03:00.1: invalid short VPD tag 00 at offset 1


Kind regards,

Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ