[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120223854.GH13936@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:38:54 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, acme@...nel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] x86, perf: counter freezing breaks rr
> In fact, I'll argue FREEZE_ON_OVERFLOW is unfixably broken for
> independent counters, because while one counter overflows, we'll stall
> counting on all others until we've handled the PMI.
>
> Even though the PMI might not be for them and they very much want/need
> to continue counting.
We stop all counters in any case for the PMI. With freeze-on-PMI it just
happens slightly earlier.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists