linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SoC-specific string for sdhci-msm-v4 nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V7RM2AEM857VJMZmFcBOTSL+Aa03=wiricMV9DZ=NCRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:12:14 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SoC-specific string for
 sdhci-msm-v4 nodes

Andy,

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:09 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> As per upstream discussion [1], we should have an SoC-specific
> compatible string for Qualcomm's SDHCI nodes.  Let's add it.
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105203657.GA32282@bogus
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 4 ++--
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

This patch and the 2nd patch in this series are ready to land.  The
bindings change related to this has been Acked by Rob and can now be
found in Ulf's "next" branch.  See:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ulfh/mmc.git/commit/?h=next&id=c1f921e9b691d0110f46c55fdeb8762b85994fba

...everything here should be fully backward compatible so it can be
landed without concern for any dependencies.

-Doug