[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120085447.GB19171@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:54:47 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the drm tree
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:16:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_ttm.c
>
> between commits:
>
> a64f784bb14a ("drm/ttm: initialize globals during device init (v2)")
>
> from the drm tree and commit:
>
> cd76c287a52f ("staging: vboxvideo: Cleanup the comments")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the comments updated by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Fix seems sane to me, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists