[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b3bf920-b8e1-c8c5-11cd-5a7443eda521@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:25:50 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ARM: tegra: Fix DRAM refresh-interval clobbering
on resume from LP1 on Tegra30
On 19/11/2018 22:09, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 20.11.2018 0:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 30/08/2018 19:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> The DRAM refresh-interval is getting erroneously set to "1" on exiting
>>> from memory self-refreshing mode. The clobbered interval causes the
>>> "refresh request overflow timeout" error raised by the External Memory
>>> Controller on exiting from LP1 on Tegra30.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
>>> index 801fe58978ae..99ac9c6dcf7c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
>>> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>>> #define EMC_CFG 0xc
>>> #define EMC_ADR_CFG 0x10
>>> #define EMC_TIMING_CONTROL 0x28
>>> -#define EMC_REFRESH 0x70
>>> #define EMC_NOP 0xdc
>>> #define EMC_SELF_REF 0xe0
>>> #define EMC_MRW 0xe8
>>> @@ -459,7 +458,6 @@ emc_wait_auto_cal_onetime:
>>> cmp r10, #TEGRA30
>>> streq r1, [r0, #EMC_NOP]
>>> streq r1, [r0, #EMC_NOP]
>>> - streq r1, [r0, #EMC_REFRESH]
>>>
>>> emc_device_mask r1, r0
>>
>> This does look incorrect and it appears Tegra20 has the same bug.
>
> Indeed.. somehow this doesn't cause any problems on T20. Maybe this affects only specific timing configurations and it's just a luck that "refresh overflow" isn't getting raised.
>
>> However, looking at the EMC_REFRESH register it appears that bits 5:0
>> are the REFRESH_LO and bits 15:6 are the refresh interval. So this seems
>> to imply the interval is set to 0 and not 1. So maybe the commit message
>> needs to be fixed up.
>
> Do you mean that EMC_REFRESH is a fractional value?
No the more I look at this, I just think it is a badly describe register
in the TRM. I think that your description is correct afterall.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists