linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mips: remove syscall table entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2o+jKd0EF81TezmJbTLBPRN9frCBf3wvxySa0sEbC+-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:54:07 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc:     Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        "open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
        Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mips: remove syscall table entries

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:29 PM Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Firoz,
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:44:19AM +0530, Firoz Khan wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
> > index a9b895f..4eee437 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S
> > @@ -208,6 +208,18 @@ einval: li       v0, -ENOSYS
> >       jr      ra
> >       END(sys_syscall)
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_FPAFF
> > +     /*
> > +      * For FPU affinity scheduling on MIPS MT processors, we need to
> > +      * intercept sys_sched_xxxaffinity() calls until we get a proper hook
> > +      * in kernel/sched/core.c.  Considered only temporary we only support
> > +      * these hooks for the 32-bit kernel - there is no MIPS64 MT processor
> > +      * atm.
> > +      */
> > +#define mipsmt_sys_sched_setaffinity sys_sched_setaffinity
> > +#define mipsmt_sys_sched_getaffinity sys_sched_getaffinity
>
> Is this backwards? ie. should it be:
>
>     #define sys_sched_setaffinity mipsmt_sys_sched_setaffinity
>     #define sys_sched_getaffinity mipsmt_sys_sched_getaffinity
>
> ?
>
> I don't see how the mipsmt_* functions will ever be used after this
> patch.

Good catch!

> > -      * atm.
> > -      */
> > -     PTR     mipsmt_sys_sched_setaffinity
> > -     PTR     mipsmt_sys_sched_getaffinity
> > -#else
> >       PTR     sys_sched_setaffinity
> >       PTR     sys_sched_getaffinity           /* 4240 */
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_FPAFF */
> >       PTR     sys_io_setup

My guess would be that he removed the wrong lines here instead,
and the first half was intentional.

       Arnd