linux-kernel - uprobe support mix of ftrace and perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181120220156.7d94d8c707570411870222fd@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:01:56 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: uprobe support mix of ftrace and perf

Hello Oleg,

I have a question about the (revert) commit 48212542067a 
("tracing/uprobes: Revert "Support mix of ftrace and perf""). I found
this limitation still exists on uprobe events. 

Would you have any plan or idea to fix this issue? I thought this revert
patch was a tentative one, and should be fixed afterwards.

Since kprobe events already supported the mix of ftrace and perf, user may
confuse why they can not use the uprobe event if it is used by ftrace.
(perf probe treats both events transparently, and ftrace event interface too.)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>