lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:01:56 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: uprobe support mix of ftrace and perf

Hello Oleg,

I have a question about the (revert) commit 48212542067a 
("tracing/uprobes: Revert "Support mix of ftrace and perf""). I found
this limitation still exists on uprobe events. 

Would you have any plan or idea to fix this issue? I thought this revert
patch was a tentative one, and should be fixed afterwards.

Since kprobe events already supported the mix of ftrace and perf, user may
confuse why they can not use the uprobe event if it is used by ftrace.
(perf probe treats both events transparently, and ftrace event interface too.)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ