linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix swap offset when replacing shmem page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 05:12:47 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:     Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix swap offset when replacing shmem page

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:07:27PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> I don't much like my original use of the name "swap_index", when it was
> not the index in a swapfile (though it was the index in the radix tree);
> but it will become a correct name with your patch.
> 
> Though Matthew Wilcox seems to want us to avoid saying "radix tree"...

Naming is hard ... but the Linux radix tree looks almost nothing like
a classic computer science radix tree.  If you try to reconcile our
implementation with the wikipedia article on radix trees, you'll get
very confused.

A lot of places where we were saying 'radix tree' in comments should
really have said 'page cache'.  So is this a swap cache index?  I'm
not really familiar enough with the swapping code to say.