[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120142000.GB11162@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:20:00 +0100
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
marc.zyngier@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Use raw_spinlock for locks
taken in IRQ context
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 05:07:55PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote:
> While testing KVM running on PREEMPT_RT, starting guest could simply
> freeze the machine. This is because we are using spinlocks for VGIC
> locks, which is invalid in the VGIC case since the locks must be take
> with interrupts disabled.
>
> The solution is to use raw_spinlock instead of spinlocks.
>
> Replacing those locks also highlighted an issue where we attempt to
> cond_resched with interrupts disabled.
>
> Patch 1 fixes the cond_resched issue.
I don't agree with this fix without seeing a more thorough analysis.
> Patch 2-4 replace the VGIC spinlocks with raw_spinlocks
>
For these:
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>
Thanks,
Christoffer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists