[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120154429.e4jcn2xxkbh3fits@flea>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:44:29 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
TL Lim <tllim@...e64.org>, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Probe tcon0 during
dsi_bind
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 05:06:32PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:08 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:09:10PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > Probe tcon0 during dsi_bind, so-that the tcon attributes like
> > > divider value, clock rate can get whenever it need.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 7 +++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > index d60955880c43..66a01061e51d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > > #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> > >
> > > #include "sun4i_drv.h"
> > > +#include "sun4i_tcon.h"
> > > #include "sun6i_mipi_dsi.h"
> > >
> > > #include <video/mipi_display.h>
> > > @@ -1007,6 +1008,7 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> > > struct drm_device *drm = data;
> > > struct sun4i_drv *drv = drm->dev_private;
> > > struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon0 = sun4i_get_tcon0(drm);
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > if (!dsi->panel)
> > > @@ -1014,6 +1016,11 @@ static int sun6i_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> > >
> > > dsi->drv = drv;
> > >
> > > + if (!tcon0)
> > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >
> > You can't fall in that condition. The component framework won't call
> > bind unless every components have been probed.
>
> Since tcon0 is already probed is it? if so I can return -EINVAL is it ok?
Sounds good yes.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists