[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120160010.GH3894@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:00:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, evgreen@...omium.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
ryandcase@...omium.org, David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] regulator: core: Don't assume always_on when
is_enabled returns err
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:26:49PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> At boot sometimes regulators (like qcom-rpmh-regulator) will return
> -EINVAL if we don't know the enable state of the regulator. We
> shouldn't take this to mean that the regulator is an always-on
> regulator, but that was what was happening since "-EINVAL" is non-zero
> and a few places in the code were not properly checking for errors.
This still results in breakage - if the regulator fails to read when
we're initializing then we won't flag the regualtor as always_on, the
regulator would need to tell the framework when it becomes readable.
This hardware really is fragile :(
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists