linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] regulator: core: Remove loop disabling supplies in regulator_force

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:59:32 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, ryandcase@...omium.org,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] regulator: core: Remove loop disabling supplies in
 regulator_force_disable()

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:57:32AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:25 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I do wish there
> > were a way to flag API calls as needing review :(

> Would it be worth adding a WARN_ON(1) splat here or at least a
> "dev_warn" so people knew it wasn't really an API for general use?
> ...or is that going overboard?

That might work ehre but it's not just this call, and the trouble is
that there are legitimate use cases and we can't exactly have a magic
"no, I know what I'm doing" flag that things need to pass or anything.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)