linux-kernel - Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:01:03 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO
 number" to the regulator tree

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:57:16PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On 20/11/18 16:34, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> > Deferred probe was there already. This patch however introduced the
> > warning from gpiolib and I would like to have it fixed somehow. In both

> I don't follow what it is you want, are you asking that it shouldn't probe
> defer, or that it shouldn't log the reason why it deferred?

He's complaining that gpiolib and/or the driver's usage of it shouldn't
be generating a backtrace in normal operation.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)