linux-kernel - Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO number" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5eec838b-e454-9ce4-22b1-7d00ef28ead4@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:10:17 +0000
From:   Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: Applied "regulator: wm8994: Pass descriptor instead of GPIO
 number" to the regulator tree

On 20/11/18 17:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 04:57:16PM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>> On 20/11/18 16:34, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
>>> Deferred probe was there already. This patch however introduced the
>>> warning from gpiolib and I would like to have it fixed somehow. In both
> 
>> I don't follow what it is you want, are you asking that it shouldn't probe
>> defer, or that it shouldn't log the reason why it deferred?
> 
> He's complaining that gpiolib and/or the driver's usage of it shouldn't
> be generating a backtrace in normal operation.
> 
Ah, I didn't see that. I seem to have not received the start of this thread and
the subsequent discussion only includes the -517 warnings not a mention of
a backtrace.