lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPpJ_ed-A_mkPJieZA4pHaRbY0SGpOEXP04aY4g1b60PzMGQuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:13:40 +0800
From:   Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
To:     denis.ciocca@...com
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux@...lessm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: Fix the sleep time for sampling

Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@...com> 於 2018年11月20日 週二 上午3:05寫道:
>
> Hi Jian,
>
> Not clear to me why should be + instead of *.
>
> ODR is expressed in Hz, so (1/Hz) = period in seconds (1 sample sampling time) [s]
> 1000 * (1/Hz) = period in milliseconds (1 sample sampling time) [ms]
> n * 1000 * (1/Hz) = n times period in milliseconds (n times sample sampling time) [ms]
>
> In your case you assume bootime is in milliseconds.

Yes, I assume that according to the original comment.

>Maybe we can change the comment and use 'number of samples ...'.

Making the meaning more clear is better.

However, does the bootime of the measurement need as the long time to
be enabled?
If the sampling rate is 1Hz and n is 2, then they will do msleep with
2000 ms for each st_sensors_read_info_raw.

Regards,
Jian-Hong Pan

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-iio-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-iio-owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Jian-Hong Pan
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:12 PM
> To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>; Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>; Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>; Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
> Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux@...lessm.com; Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] iio: st_sensors: Fix the sleep time for sampling
>
> According to the description of st_sensor_settings and st_sensor_data structures' comments:
> - bootime: samples to discard when sensor passing from power-down to power-up.
> - odr: Output data rate of the sensor [Hz].
>
> The sleep time should be
> sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->odr ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> index 26fbd1bd9413..6b87ea657a92 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int st_sensors_read_info_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>                 if (err < 0)
>                         goto out;
>
> -               msleep((sdata->sensor_settings->bootime * 1000) / sdata->odr);
> +               msleep(sdata->sensor_settings->bootime + 1000 / sdata->odr);
>                 err = st_sensors_read_axis_data(indio_dev, ch, val);
>                 if (err < 0)
>                         goto out;
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ