[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181121164820.GC12656@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:48:20 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.co>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel-usart: add DMA bindings for
SPI mode
Hi Rob,
On 21/11/2018 10:41:01-0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > +Optional properties in serial and SPI mode:
> > +- dma bindings for dma transfer:
> > + - dmas: DMA specifier, consisting of a phandle to DMA controller node,
> > + memory peripheral interface and USART DMA channel ID, FIFO configuration.
> > + Refer to dma.txt and atmel-dma.txt for details.
> > + - dma-names: "rx" for RX channel, "tx" for TX channel.
>
> > + dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>
> The dma-names should have a defined order.
>
Why is that? Isn't the purpose of names to get rid of any particular
ordering?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists