[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wia47WugL2b02gMx49AfpUmm5jp3tBoUL5dF2YomSGN2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:43:42 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
brgerst@...il.com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:26 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> Can we maybe use this as an excuse to ask for some reasonable instructions to access user memory?
I did that long ago. It's why we have CLAC/STAC today. I was told that
what I actually asked for (get an instruction to access user space - I
suggested using a segment override prefix) was not viable.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists