[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181122100812.GO2131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 11:08:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/14] function_graph: Rewrite to allow multiple
users
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Well the fuction graph tracer is arguably the strongest of the tracers.
> It shows both the entrance and exit of a function, can give the timings
> of a function, and shows the execution of the code quite nicely.
>
> But it has one major flaw.
>
> It can't let more than one user access it at a time.
The reason I 'never' use it is performance, it _sucks_.. I've never ran
into the multi-user issue.
So while I don't think the rewrite is bad, this argument here is.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists