[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66b90226-5d0e-7344-5220-908aa243b014@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 18:34:10 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <weidu.du@...wei.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: erofs: separate into init_once / always
Hi Greg,
On 2018/11/22 18:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> +
>> + DBG_BUGON(work->nr_pages);
>> + DBG_BUGON(work->vcnt);
> How can these ever be triggered? I understand the need for debugging
> code when you are writing code, but at this point it shouldn't be needed
> anymore, right?
I need to avoid some fields is not 0 when the new workgroup is created (because
work->nr_pages and work->vcnt == 0 usually after the previous workgroup is freed).
But that is not obvious, it is promised by the current logic.
In order to not introduce such a issue in the future, or there are some potential
race (work->nr_pages and work->vcnt != 0 when the previous workgroup == 0), it need
to be noticed to developpers as early as possible.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists