[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181122140432.GH2113@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:04:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net,
javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/15] sched/topology: Make Energy Aware Scheduling
depend on schedutil
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:18:50PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> + if (rd->pd)
> + pr_warn("rd %*pbl: Disabling EAS, schedutil is mandatory\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
> + goto free;
I would have preferred just not allowing the governor to change at all,
but if you want to allow that, this is, I suppose, the best you can do.
Rafael, are you otherwise OK with the grubbing inside cpufreq?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists