[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154290561362.11623.15299444358726283678@skylake-alporthouse-com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:53:34 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed
to fail
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-11-22 16:51:04)
> Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
Most callers could handle the failure correctly. It looks like the
failure was not propagated for convenience.
-Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists