[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgox1vM7EiA_Ga7sY0A-piyNQPtmB=HZasOwYXySkaYXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:35:37 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
brgerst@...il.com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> So I think your patch is viable. Also, with that patch applied,
> put_user_ex() should become worse than worthless
Yes. I hate those special-case _ex variants.
I guess I should just properly forward-port my patch series where the
different steps are separated out (not jumbled up like that patch I
actually posted).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists