[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bf811213-e1ad-d70e-cf9e-57735e359377@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:07:50 -0200
From: Murilo Fossa Vicentini <muvic@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Murilo Fossa Vicentini <muvic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.139-stable review
On 22/11/18 14:33, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'ibmvnic_xmit':
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:789:40: error: implicit declaration
> of function 'skb_vlan_tag_present'
>
> Caused by 5f51bb855fa1 ("ibmvnic: fix accelerated VLAN handling").
> Problem is missing include of linux/if_vlan.h, which was added upstream
> with commit 6052d5e2a1961b ("ibmvnic: Insert header on VLAN tagged
> received frame").
>
> I have no idea if the offending patch fixes 6052d5e2a1961b, if both are
> independent, if both are needed, or if none is needed.
> Copying the authors of both patches.
Both address different parts of the code within the same VLAN
functionality, patch 5f51bb855fa1 (or upstream e84b47941e15) is making a
change on the transmit side, and the patch I sent upstream
(6052d5e2a196) addresses an issue when the system firmware strips the
VLAN tag on the receive side.
In the context of having proper VLAN support for the ibmvnic driver I
would say both are needed, although potentially there are other patches
needed for this functionality to work properly, for example upstream
commit da75e3b6a029 (ibmvnic: Account for VLAN tag in L2 Header
descriptor) and upstream commit 8dff66cc4195 (ibmvnic: Account for VLAN
tag in L2 Header descriptor).
Best regards,
Murilo Vicentini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists