linux-kernel - Re: [patch 20/24] x86/speculation: Split out TIF update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:37:59 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dave Stewart <david.c.stewart@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 20/24] x86/speculation: Split out TIF update


* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > 
> > Had to read this twice, because the comment and the code are both correct 
> > but deal with the inverse case. This might have helped:
> > 
> > 	/*
> > 	 * Immediately update the speculation MSRs on the current task,
> > 	 * but for non-current tasks delay setting the CPU mitigation 
> > 	 * until it is scheduled next.
> > 	 */
> > 	if (tsk == current && update)
> > 		speculation_ctrl_update_current();
> > 
> > But can the target task ever be non-current here? I don't think so: the 
> > two callers are prctl and seccomp, and both are passing in the current 
> > task pointer.
> 
> See te other mail. Yes, seccomp passes non current task pointers. Will
> update the comment.

Ignore my previous mail :-)

Thanks,

	Ingo