[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f00df51af0a4491fa7d86f9dc0c07bf6@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:14:17 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Kevin Easton' <kevin@...rana.org>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"timmurray@...gle.com" <timmurray@...gle.com>,
"primiano@...gle.com" <primiano@...gle.com>,
"joelaf@...gle.com" <joelaf@...gle.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@...il.com>,
Prashant Dhamdhere <pdhamdhe@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Dominik Brodowski" <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"MatthewWilcox@...172-31-15-78" <MatthewWilcox@...172-31-15-78>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add /proc/pid_generation
From: Kevin Easton
> Sent: 22 November 2018 11:20
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:14:44PM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > This change adds a per-pid-namespace 64-bit generation number,
> > incremented on PID rollover, and exposes it via a new proc file
> > /proc/pid_generation. By examining this file before and after /proc
> > enumeration, user code can detect the potential reuse of a PID and
> > restart the task enumeration process, repeating until it gets a
> > coherent snapshot.
>
> I see downthread this patch has been withdrawn, but nonetheless I'm
> still curious - does this actually solve the problem?
>
> It seems to me that a PID could be reused within a scan even if the
> generation number remains the same at the beginning and end of a scan:
Why not allocate a 48bit generation number to each 16bit pid?
Then you have a 64bit 'extended-pid' that can be assumed to never be reused.
Provided enough interfaces are enhanced to support 'extended-pid' values
you'll never get reused values.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists