[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9822321-fca3-29bc-f5a1-c6297d2161ae@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:23:21 +0100
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>
Cc: ashok.raj@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
yi.l.liu@...el.com, yi.y.sun@...el.com, peterx@...hat.com,
tiwei.bie@...el.com, Zeng Xin <xin.zeng@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] vfio/type1: Handle different mdev isolation type
Hi Lu,
On 11/5/18 8:34 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This adds the support to determine the isolation type
> of a mediated device group by checking whether it has
> an iommu device. If an iommu device exists, an iommu
> domain will be allocated and then attached to the iommu
> device. Otherwise, keep the same behavior as it is.
>
> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sanjay Kumar <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 178264b330e7..eed26129f58c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -1427,13 +1427,40 @@ static void vfio_iommu_detach_group(struct vfio_domain *domain,
> iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> }
>
> +static bool vfio_bus_is_mdev(struct bus_type *bus)
> +{
> + struct bus_type *mdev_bus;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + mdev_bus = symbol_get(mdev_bus_type);
> + if (mdev_bus) {
> + ret = (bus == mdev_bus);
> + symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_mdev_iommu_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct device **old = data, *new;
> +
> + new = vfio_mdev_get_iommu_device(dev);
> + if (*old && *old != new)
if !new can't you return -EINVAL as well?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *old = new;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> struct vfio_group *group;
> struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> - struct bus_type *bus = NULL, *mdev_bus;
> + struct bus_type *bus = NULL;
> int ret;
> bool resv_msi, msi_remap;
> phys_addr_t resv_msi_base;
> @@ -1468,11 +1495,18 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> if (ret)
> goto out_free;
>
> - mdev_bus = symbol_get(mdev_bus_type);
> + if (vfio_bus_is_mdev(bus)) {
> + struct device *iommu_device = NULL;
>
> - if (mdev_bus) {
> - if ((bus == mdev_bus) && !iommu_present(bus)) {
> - symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> + group->mdev_group = true;
> +
> + /* Determine the isolation type */
> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, &iommu_device,
> + vfio_mdev_iommu_device);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + if (!iommu_device) {
> if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> iommu->external_domain = domain;
> @@ -1482,9 +1516,11 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> list_add(&group->next,
> &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +
extra new line
> return 0;
> }
> - symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> +
> + bus = iommu_device->bus;
> }
>
> domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(bus);
>
Thanks
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists