linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each vma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73b55240-d36c-cf97-d7fd-85e2ae1e9309@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 16:07:06 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each
 vma

On 11/20/18 11:35 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> Userspace falls short when trying to find out whether a specific memory
> range is eligible for THP. There are usecases that would like to know
> that
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809251248450.50347@chino.kir.corp.google.com
> : This is used to identify heap mappings that should be able to fault thp
> : but do not, and they normally point to a low-on-memory or fragmentation
> : issue.
> 
> The only way to deduce this now is to query for hg resp. nh flags and
> confronting the state with the global setting. Except that there is
> also PR_SET_THP_DISABLE that might change the picture. So the final
> logic is not trivial. Moreover the eligibility of the vma depends on
> the type of VMA as well. In the past we have supported only anononymous
> memory VMAs but things have changed and shmem based vmas are supported
> as well these days and the query logic gets even more complicated
> because the eligibility depends on the mount option and another global
> configuration knob.
> 
> Simplify the current state and report the THP eligibility in
> /proc/<pid>/smaps for each existing vma. Reuse transparent_hugepage_enabled
> for this purpose. The original implementation of this function assumes
> that the caller knows that the vma itself is supported for THP so make
> the core checks into __transparent_hugepage_enabled and use it for
> existing callers. __show_smap just use the new transparent_hugepage_enabled
> which also checks the vma support status (please note that this one has
> to be out of line due to include dependency issues).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

Not thrilled by this, but kernel is always better suited to report this,
than userspace piecing it together from multiple sources, relying on
possibly outdated knowledge of kernel implementation details...

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

A nitpick:

> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |  3 +++
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c                 |  2 ++
>  include/linux/huge_mm.h            | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  mm/huge_memory.c                   | 12 +++++++++++-
>  mm/memory.c                        |  4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index b1fda309f067..06562bab509a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ SwapPss:               0 kB
>  KernelPageSize:        4 kB
>  MMUPageSize:           4 kB
>  Locked:                0 kB
> +THPeligible:           0

I would use THP_Eligible. There are already fields with underscore in smaps.