[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181123164052.cjbm5ekqigvfpl7t@treble>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 10:40:52 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
brgerst@...il.com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:13:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Note to self: watch out for patches that change altinstructions and don't
> make premature vmlinux size impact assumptions. :-)
I noticed a similar problem with ORC data. As it turns out, size's
"text" calculation also includes read-only sections. That includes
.rodata and anything else not writable.
Maybe we need a more sensible "size" script for the kernel. It would be
trivial to implement based on the output of "readelf -S vmlinux".
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists