[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181124161521.GB30310@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 08:15:21 -0800
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Dr. Greg" <greg@...ellic.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@...el.com>, shay.katz-zamir@...el.com,
haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>, mark.shanahan@...el.com,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, andy@...radead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 18/23] platform/x86: Intel SGX driver
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:15:08AM -0600, Dr. Greg wrote:
> Malware would not necessarily need the Intel attestation service.
> Once access to the PROVISION bit is available, malware teams could
> simply build their own attestation service.
AFAIK not possible as they wouldn't have access to the root provisioning
key. Can be confirmed from the SDM's key derivation table (41-56).
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists