linux-kernel - Re: [tip:timers/core] time: Add SPDX license identifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:15:14 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     broonie@...nel.org, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
        davidriley@...omium.org, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
        cminyard@...sta.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        pombredanne@...b.com, ccross@...roid.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] time: Add SPDX license identifiers

On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 03:19 -0800, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The SPDX
> identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the
> full boiler plate text.

Is the "legally binding shorthand" actually proven anywhere?
I am not aware of any case law for this.