[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181124053138.GA242510@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 21:31:38 -0800
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/14] function_graph: Convert ret_stack to a series
of longs
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> In order to make it possible to have multiple callbacks registered with the
> function_graph tracer, the retstack needs to be converted from an array of
> ftrace_ret_stack structures to an array of longs. This will allow to store
> the list of callbacks on the stack for the return side of the functions.
>
> [ Note, this currently breaks architectures that access the ret_stack of a
> task to handle unwinding when 'return_to_handler' is on the stack ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
> kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index d6183a55e8eb..71a084a300da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> int curr_ret_depth;
>
> /* Stack of return addresses for return function tracing: */
> - struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack;
> + unsigned long *ret_stack;
>
> /* Timestamp for last schedule: */
> unsigned long long ftrace_timestamp;
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> index 9b85638ecded..1389fe39f64c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,17 @@
> #define ASSIGN_OPS_HASH(opsname, val)
> #endif
>
> +#define FGRAPH_RET_SIZE (sizeof(struct ftrace_ret_stack))
> +#define FGRAPH_RET_INDEX (ALIGN(FGRAPH_RET_SIZE, sizeof(long)) / sizeof(long))
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_SIZE (FTRACE_RETFUNC_DEPTH * FGRAPH_RET_SIZE)
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_INDEX \
> + (ALIGN(SHADOW_STACK_SIZE, sizeof(long)) / sizeof(long))
> +#define SHADOW_STACK_MAX_INDEX (SHADOW_STACK_INDEX - FGRAPH_RET_INDEX)
> +
> +#define RET_STACK(t, index) ((struct ftrace_ret_stack *)(&(t)->ret_stack[index]))
> +#define RET_STACK_INC(c) ({ c += FGRAPH_RET_INDEX; })
> +#define RET_STACK_DEC(c) ({ c -= FGRAPH_RET_INDEX; })
> +
[...]
> @@ -514,7 +531,7 @@ void ftrace_graph_init_task(struct task_struct *t)
>
> void ftrace_graph_exit_task(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> - struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack = t->ret_stack;
> + unsigned long *ret_stack = t->ret_stack;
>
> t->ret_stack = NULL;
> /* NULL must become visible to IRQs before we free it: */
> @@ -526,12 +543,10 @@ void ftrace_graph_exit_task(struct task_struct *t)
> /* Allocate a return stack for each task */
> static int start_graph_tracing(void)
> {
> - struct ftrace_ret_stack **ret_stack_list;
> + unsigned long **ret_stack_list;
> int ret, cpu;
>
> - ret_stack_list = kmalloc_array(FTRACE_RETSTACK_ALLOC_SIZE,
> - sizeof(struct ftrace_ret_stack *),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + ret_stack_list = kmalloc(SHADOW_STACK_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>
I had dumped the fgraph size related macros to understand the patch better, I
got:
[ 0.909528] val of FGRAPH_RET_SIZE is 40
[ 0.910250] val of FGRAPH_RET_INDEX is 5
[ 0.910866] val of FGRAPH_ARRAY_SIZE is 16
[ 0.911488] val of FGRAPH_ARRAY_MASK is 255
[ 0.912134] val of FGRAPH_MAX_INDEX is 16
[ 0.912751] val of FGRAPH_INDEX_SHIFT is 8
[ 0.913382] val of FGRAPH_FRAME_SIZE is 168
[ 0.914033] val of FGRAPH_FRAME_INDEX is 21
FTRACE_RETFUNC_DEPTH is 50
[ 0.914686] val of SHADOW_STACK_SIZE is 8400
I had a concern about memory overhead per-task. It seems the total memory
needed per task for the stack is 8400 bytes (with my configuration with
FUNCTION_PROFILE
turned off).
Where as before it would be 32 * 40 = 1280 bytes. That looks like ~7 times
more than before.
On my system with ~4000 threads, that becomes ~32MB which seems a bit
wasteful especially if there was only one or 2 function graph callbacks
registered and most of the callback array in the stack isn't used.
Could we make the array size configurable at compile time and start it with a
small number like 4 or 6?
Also for patches 1 through 10:
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists