linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: hid-sensor-hub: clean up indentation, remove extraneous tab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181125140427.3082dd3c@archlinux>
Date:   Sun, 25 Nov 2018 14:04:27 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: hid-sensor-hub: clean up indentation, remove
 extraneous tab

On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 16:27:57 +0000
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> The statement is indented too much by one level, fix this by
> removing the extraneous tab.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
because lots of other stuff in there needs build testing.

thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> index ed3849d6fc6a..b2143d7b4ccb 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-attributes.c
> @@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ static void adjust_exponent_nano(int *val0, int *val1, int scale0,
>  			scale1 = scale1 % pow_10(8 - i);
>  		}
>  		*val0 += res;
> -			*val1 = scale1 * pow_10(exp);
> +		*val1 = scale1 * pow_10(exp);
>  	} else if (exp < 0) {
>  		exp = abs(exp);
>  		if (exp > 9) {