[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181125021059.GA1190@altlinux.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 05:10:59 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@...il.com>
Cc: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
strace-devel@...ts.strace.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/3] ptrace: pass type of a syscall-stop in
ptrace_message
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 03:54:02PM -1000, Joey Pabalinas wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 02:22:27AM +0100, Elvira Khabirova wrote:
> > Define two constants, PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY and
> > PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT, and place them in ptrace_message
> > for the duration of syscall-stops.
> > This way ptracers can distinguish syscall-enter-stops
> > from syscall-exit-stops using PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG request.
>
> Is there an advantage to using two constants instead of a single
> sys_exit bit (set/unset for syscall-exit-stop/syscall-enter-stop)?
Given that without this patch the value returned by PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG
during syscall stop is undefined, we need two different ptrace_message
values that cannot be set by other ptrace events to enable reliable
identification of syscall-enter-stop and syscall-exit-stop in userspace:
if we make PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG return 0 or any other value routinely set by
other ptrace events, it would be hard for userspace to find out whether
the kernel implements new semantics or not.
--
ldv
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists