[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126045709.GD540@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:57:09 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] debugobjects: Move printk out of db lock
critical sections
On (11/23/18 12:48), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > This should make serial consoles re-entrant.
> > So printk->console_driver_write() hopefully will not deadlock.
>
> Is the re-entrance safe? Some risk might be acceptable in Oops/panic
> situations. It is much less acceptable for random warnings.
Good question.
But what's the alternative? A deadlock in a serial console driver; such
that even panic() is not guaranteed to make through it (at least of now).
debug objects are used from the code which cannot re-entrant console
drivers.
bust_spinlock is called from various paths, not only panic.
git grep bust_spinlocks | wc -l
62
So we already switch to re-entrant consoles (and accept the risks) in
mm/fault.c, kernel/traps.c and so on. Which, I guess, makes us a little
more confident, faults/traps happen often enough.
It seems, that, more or less, serial consoles are ready to handle it.
UART consoles in ->write() callbacks just do a bunch of writel() [for
every char + \r\n].
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists