lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:04:55 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, dyoung@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RESEND v7] add reserved e820 ranges to the kdump
 kernel e820 table

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:44:46AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 11/23/18 9:12 PM, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> > These patches add the new I/O resource descriptor 'IORES_DESC_RESERVED'
> > for the iomem resources search interfaces, and in order to make it still
> > work after the new descriptor is added, these codes originally related
> > to 'IORES_DESC_NONE' have been updated.
> 
> I'm having a really hard time figuring out what problem these patches solve.
> 
> What end-user visible behavior does this set change?

Yeah, that was a long process of digging out the "why".

I'd recommend reading the previous threads and, more specifically:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CABhMZUUscS3jUZUSM5Y6EYJK6weo7Mjj5-EAKGvbw0qEe%2B38zw@mail.gmail.com

in short: we need to export e820 reserved ranges to the second kernel so
that it can talk to PCI devices properly. (And I'm wondering how it did
work until now...)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ