linux-kernel - Re: Question about "regulator: core: Only count load for enabled consumers" in -next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181126182934.GN9715@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:29:34 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     masneyb@...tation.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about "regulator: core: Only count load for enabled
 consumers" in -next

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:11:48AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:

> just takes the load you pass it and sends it on.  It looks like you
> can still force the mode but it looks like it's using a custom
> attribute for that (qcom,force-mode).  I wonder if that should be
> changed to use 'regulator-initial-mode'...

Yes (with compatibility for old DTs of course).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)