[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3361921.c4PKPBIJKP@phil>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 06:58:48 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@...ystems.com.br>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: rv1108: Fix the PMU interrupt number
Hi Otavio,
Am Sonntag, 25. November 2018, 22:19:02 CET schrieb Otavio Salvador:
> According to the Rockchip vendor tree the PMU interrupt number is
> 76, so fix it accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Berton <fabio.berton@...ystems.com.br>
looks ok, especially as the TRM I have doesn't list neither irqs :-)
But please explain the second Signed-off by Fabio?
If Fabio is the original author, the patch From should reflect that
and the Signed-off-by lines should be swapped. As it is now
I would expect Fabio being the one sending the patches.
Or is it supposed to be a "Co-developed-by:"?
See Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst.
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists