[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126162750.500a7dbd@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:27:50 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/14] function_graph: Remove unused
task_curr_ret_stack()
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:02:07 -1000
Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 08:27:16PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > The static inline function task_curr_ret_stack() is unused, remove it.
>
> Just want ot make sure I understand this correctly, instead of using this
> function, the convention now is to just directly assign `t->curr_ret_stack = -1`?
>
Not sure what you mean. This function would just return the value of
curr_ret_stack, it didn't modify it.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists