linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <937675447ad1ec2665d0b6f70390d498a01255d0.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:52:02 -0800
From:   Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:     Josh Elsasser <jelsasser@...neta.com>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:     intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ixgbe: recognize 1000BaseLX SFP modules as 1Gbps

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:54 -0800, Josh Elsasser wrote:
> Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no> wrote:
> 
> > Not that it matters much I guess, but I think LX SFPs were
> > unsupported
> > at that time. The LX support appears to have been added under the
> > radar
> > while refactoring ixgbe_setup_sfp_modules_X550em in commit
> > e23f33367882
> > ("ixgbe: Fix 1G and 10G link stability for X550EM_x SFP+")
> 
> Looks like you’re right. Want me to respin with an additional “Fixes”
> tag?

No need to re-spin the patch, just reply with the additional "Fixes"
tag and if patchwork does not pick it up, I will add it to the patch I
have in my tree for validation and review.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)