linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch: simplify several early memory allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181126082134.GA10530@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 00:21:34 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>,
        Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
        Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arch: simplify several early memory allocations

>  static void __init *early_alloc_aligned(unsigned long sz, unsigned long align)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = __va(memblock_phys_alloc(sz, align));
> -	memset(ptr, 0, sz);
> -	return ptr;
> +	return memblock_alloc(sz, align);
>  }

What is the point of keeping this wrapper?

>  static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = __va(memblock_phys_alloc(sz, sz));
> -	memset(ptr, 0, sz);
> -	return ptr;
> +	return memblock_alloc(sz, sz);
>  }

Same here.