[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126105005.GA33554@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:50:05 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....us>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, arnd@...db.de,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] debugobjects: scale the static pool size
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:45:54AM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> On 11/25/18 11:52 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> > BTW, calling debug_objects_mem_init() before kmemleak_init() actually
> > could trigger a loop on machines with 160+ CPUs until the pool is filled
> > up,
> >
> > debug_objects_pool_min_level += num_possible_cpus() * 4;
> >
> > [1] while (obj_pool_free < debug_objects_pool_min_level)
> >
> > kmemleak_init
> > kmemleak_ignore (from replaced static debug objects)
> > make_black_object
> > put_object
> > __call_rcu (kernel/rcu/tree.c)
> > debug_rcu_head_queue
> > debug_object_activate
> > debug_object_init
> > fill_pool
> > kmemleak_ignore (looping in [1])
> > make_black_object
> > ...
> >
> > I think until this is resolved, there is no way to move
> > debug_objects_mem_init() before kmemleak_init().
>
> I believe this is a separate issue that kmemleak is broken with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD anyway where the infinite loop above could be
> triggered in the existing code as well, i.e., once the pool need be refilled
> (fill_pool()) after the system boot up, debug object creation will call
> kmemleak_ignore() and it will create a new rcu debug_object_init(), and then
> it will call fill_pool() again and again. As the results, the system is
> locking up during kernel compilations.
>
> Hence, I'll send out a patch for debug objects with large CPUs anyway and
> deal with kmemleak + CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD issue later.
I haven't hit this before but I can see why it happens. Kmemleak uses
RCU for freeing its own data structures to avoid a recursive call to
sl*b (kmem_cache_free()). Since we already tell kmemleak to ignore the
debug_objects_cache allocations, I think we could as well add
SLAB_NOLEAKTRACE to kmem_cache_create() (I haven't tried yet, this was
not a documented API for kmemleak, rather used to avoid kmemleak
tracking itself).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists