linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 20/70] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross compiling with Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181126105048.780330753@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:50:35 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 20/70] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross compiling with Clang

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

commit 86a9df597cdd564d2d29c65897bcad42519e3678 upstream.

I was not seeing my linker flags getting added when using ld-option when
cross compiling with Clang. Upon investigation, this seems to be due to
a difference in how GCC vs Clang handle cross compilation.

GCC is configured at build time to support one backend, that is implicit
when compiling.  Clang is explicit via the use of `-target <triple>` and
ships with all supported backends by default.

GNU Make feature test macros that compile then link will always fail
when cross compiling with Clang unless Clang's triple is passed along to
the compiler. For example:

$ clang -x c /dev/null -c -o temp.o
$ aarch64-linux-android/bin/ld -E temp.o
aarch64-linux-android/bin/ld:
unknown architecture of input file `temp.o' is incompatible with
aarch64 output
aarch64-linux-android/bin/ld:
warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to
0000000000400078
$ echo $?
1

$ clang -target aarch64-linux-android- -x c /dev/null -c -o temp.o
$ aarch64-linux-android/bin/ld -E temp.o
aarch64-linux-android/bin/ld:
warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 00000000004002e4
$ echo $?
0

This causes conditional checks that invoke $(CC) without the target
triple, then $(LD) on the result, to always fail.

Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
[nc: Fix conflicts due to lack of commit 3298b690b21cd in linux-4.4.y
     Use KBUILD_CFLAGS instead of CC_OPTION_FLAGS because commit
     d26e94149276f that introduced that variable isn't in 4.4 either]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 scripts/Kbuild.include |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/scripts/Kbuild.include
+++ b/scripts/Kbuild.include
@@ -147,12 +147,13 @@ cc-ifversion = $(shell [ $(cc-version) $
 # cc-ldoption
 # Usage: ldflags += $(call cc-ldoption, -Wl$(comma)--hash-style=both)
 cc-ldoption = $(call try-run,\
-	$(CC) $(1) -nostdlib -x c /dev/null -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))
+	$(CC) $(1) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -nostdlib -x c /dev/null -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))

 # ld-option
 # Usage: LDFLAGS += $(call ld-option, -X)
 ld-option = $(call try-run,\
-	$(CC) -x c /dev/null -c -o "$$TMPO" ; $(LD) $(1) "$$TMPO" -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))
+	$(CC) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -x c /dev/null -c -o "$$TMPO"; \
+	$(LD) $(LDFLAGS) $(1) "$$TMPO" -o "$$TMP",$(1),$(2))

 # ar-option
 # Usage: KBUILD_ARFLAGS := $(call ar-option,D)