linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 01/46] cifs: dont dereference smb_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181126105045.633305446@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:50:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 01/46] cifs: dont dereference smb_file_target before null check

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 8c6c9bed8773375b1d54ccca2911ec892c59db5d ]

There is a null check on dst_file->private data which suggests
it can be potentially null. However, before this check, pointer
smb_file_target is derived from dst_file->private and dereferenced
in the call to tlink_tcon, hence there is a potential null pointer
deference.

Fix this by assigning smb_file_target and target_tcon after the
null pointer sanity checks.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1475302 ("Dereference before null check")

Fixes: 04b38d601239 ("vfs: pull btrfs clone API to vfs layer")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index 87658f63b374..be84d49f2406 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -927,8 +927,8 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
 	struct inode *src_inode = file_inode(src_file);
 	struct inode *target_inode = file_inode(dst_file);
 	struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_src = src_file->private_data;
-	struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data;
-	struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink);
+	struct cifsFileInfo *smb_file_target;
+	struct cifs_tcon *target_tcon;
 	unsigned int xid;
 	int rc;
 
@@ -942,6 +942,9 @@ static int cifs_clone_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t off,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	smb_file_target = dst_file->private_data;
+	target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink);
+
 	/*
 	 * Note: cifs case is easier than btrfs since server responsible for
 	 * checks for proper open modes and file type and if it wants
-- 
2.17.1