[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126122307.GA1660@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:23:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ben Woodard <woodard@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: separate MM_ANONPAGES and RLIMIT_STACK accounting
Hi Guenter,
On 11/23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 05:09:10PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > get_arg_page() checks bprm->rlim_stack.rlim_cur and re-calculates the
> > "extra" size for argv/envp pointers every time, this is a bit ugly and
> > even not strictly correct: acct_arg_size() must not account this size.
> >
> > Remove all the rlimit code in get_arg_page(). Instead, add bprm->argmin
> > calculated once at the start of __do_execve_file() and change copy_strings
> > to check bprm->p >= bprm->argmin.
> >
> > The patch adds the new helper, prepare_arg_pages() which initializes
> > bprm->argc/envc and bprm->argmin.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> This patch results in various qemu boot failures in -next. Bisect logs
> are attached. It looks like all nommu boots are failing.
^^^^^
Ah, thanks.
Yes, I forgot about the !CONFIG_MMU version of get_arg_page() which doesn't
check RLIMIT_STACK at all.
I'll send the trivial fix. Meanwile, could you test the patch below? to ensure
this is the only problem.
Oleg.
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -526,8 +526,10 @@ static int copy_strings(int argc, struct user_arg_ptr argv,
pos = bprm->p;
str += len;
bprm->p -= len;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
if (bprm->p < bprm->argmin)
goto out;
+#endif
while (len > 0) {
int offset, bytes_to_copy;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists