linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/core: Remove unnecessary check for next_task in push_{rt,dl}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181126142116.5593-1-smuchun@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:21:16 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
To:     mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2] sched/core: Remove unnecessary check for next_task in push_{rt,dl}_task()

In push_{rt,dl}_task(), we call pick_next_pushable{_dl}_task() to
pick next_task before the check. If next_task and rq->curr are equal,
which will trigger BUG_ON() in pick_next_pushable{_dl}_task(). See
the following code in pick_next_pushable{_dl}_task().

  static struct task_struct *pick_next_pushable{_dl}_task(struct rq *rq)
  {
	BUG_ON(task_current(rq, p));

	return p;
  }

The task_current() will check if task p and rq->curr are equal.
So, we can remove the unnecessary check in push_{rt,dl}_task().

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <smuchun@...il.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 5 -----
 kernel/sched/rt.c       | 5 -----
 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 470ba6b464fe..4b0189627318 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2042,11 +2042,6 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 		return 0;
 
 retry:
-	if (unlikely(next_task == rq->curr)) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If next_task preempts rq->curr, and rq->curr
 	 * can move away, it makes sense to just reschedule
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index f28157c8212b..efc3fbe205ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1824,11 +1824,6 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
 		return 0;
 
 retry:
-	if (unlikely(next_task == rq->curr)) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * It's possible that the next_task slipped in of
 	 * higher priority than current. If that's the case
-- 
2.17.1