[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126145643.GD1660@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:56:43 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv@...linux.org, esyr@...hat.com,
luto@...nel.org, strace-devel@...ts.strace.io,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/3] ptrace: pass type of a syscall-stop in
ptrace_message
On 11/25, Elvira Khabirova wrote:
>
> + * These values are stored in task->ptrace_message by tracehook_report_syscall_*
> + * to describe current syscall-stop.
> + *
> + * Values for these constants are chosen so that they do not appear
> + * in task->ptrace_message by other means.
> + */
> +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_ENTRY 0x80000000U
> +#define PTRACE_EVENTMSG_SYSCALL_EXIT 0x90000000U
Stupid question, why not
#define PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_ENTRY 8
#define PTRACE_EVENT_SYSCALL_EXIT 9
right after other PTRACE_EVENT_* constants?
The next 3/3 tries to detect PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP case anyway, so I am not sure
I understand what "do not appear in task->ptrace_message by other means" actually
means...
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists