[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jdqm5O11A4ieiLwhBYVAOGbWE7t_Orrdau3WMvLQAqKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 14:34:46 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: bvanassche@....org
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
zwisler@...nel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [driver-core PATCH v6 9/9] libnvdimm: Schedule device
registration on node local to the device
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:22 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 12:50 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Thanks Bart, so tying this back to Alex's patches, does the ordering
> > problem that Alex's patches solve impact the SCSI case? I'm looking
> > for something like "SCSI depends on asynchronous probing and without
> > 'driver core: Establish clear order of operations for deferred probe
> > and remove' probing is often needlessly serialized". I.e. does it
> > suffer from the same platform problem that libnvdimm ran into where
> > it's local async probing implementation was hindered by the driver
> > core?
>
> (+Martin)
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Patch 6/9 reduces the time needed to scan SCSI LUNs significantly. The only
> way to realize that speedup is by enabling more concurrency. That's why I
> think that patch 6/9 is a significant driver core improvement.
Perfect, Alex, with that added to the 6/9 changelog and moving to
device_private for the async state tracking you can add my
Reviewed-by.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists